CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
2.0 Introduction
Students learn best by
seeing the value and importance of the information presented in the classroom.
If the students are not interested in the material presented, they will not
learn it. In order to achieve the ultimate goal of student learning it is
important to use a combination of teaching methods and to make the classroom
environment as stimulating and interactive as possible. Students learn in many
different ways.
Some students are visual
learners, while others are auditory or kinesthetic learners. Visual learners
learn visually by means of charts, graphs, and pictures. Auditory learners
learn by listening to lectures and reading. Kinesthetic learners learn by
doing. Students can prefer one, two, or three learning styles. Because of these
different learning styles, it is important for teachers to incorporate in their
curriculum activities related to each of these learning styles so that all
students are able to succeed in their classes. While we use all of our senses
to take in information, we each seem to have preferences in how we learn best.
In order to help all students learn, we need to teach to as many of these
preferences as possible. While it may
seem impossible to do this, it can be done through thoughtful planning and
preparation. It does force us to conceptualize the class differently with a
focus on the variety of ways in which students learn. The various inventories
on learning styles allow teachers to gain insight into which areas they can use
further development in and which are already well developed (Cuaresma, 2008).
2.1 Drawing skills
"Humans
are animals who use tools": as Benjamin Franklin has said, human beings
have, as an extension of hand functions, come to make tools according to the
purpose. And the tools are refined to become easier to use, and eventually,
they led up to not only being used for the purpose of survival, but also to the
act of "drawing pictures" in order to enrich life. Pictures indeed
tell of the drawer's existence, thoughts, and inner self. As well, people enjoy
drawing. This is because drawing stimulates the universal desire to express
oneself. By expressing oneself, the heart is released.
At
the same time that drawing is this kind of individual expression, it also has
the value of communication. Drawing tends to recount far more things to the
reader than language. Children do not yet have sufficient capabilities for
abstract linguistic expression, but they have symbolic communication methods
such as drawing. Through pictures, children make communication with familiar
people, they develop skills for living, and build a sense of trust.
Drawing
for children, at the same time as being an expression of the inner self and a
communication method, is something that reveals the development that
accompanies a child's age. Children's drawings have an order of development,
and that accompanies the development of motor skills, emotional development,
psychosocial development and the development of perception. Children draw
"what they know" in their own style. In other words, the perception
functions, sensibility/emotions and motor functions interact, and there, the
factor of social experience is added and the picture is drawn onto paper.
Research
on children's drawings have arrived at the present day through developmental
research phase (developmental approach), intellectual research phase
(psychological measurement approach), and personality test phase (projection
approach). In order to have an overall approach on the children's drawings, we
must know about the above three researches. When we think about the
developmental approach, as we focus on a child's drawing activities, the
child's drawing naturally changes according to age. In order to draw what one
is thinking, the skilled control and development of the fingers becomes
necessary. As well, children draw what they know about. What they know, what
they wish to communicate to others, these are expressed not simply as they are
seen, but with the child's personal style. It follows that, the extent to which
a child is conscious of the surroundings, in other words, the breadth of the
child's world vision has a great influence on the contents of the drawing.
In
addition, in order to draw something, there is a need to have an interest in
familiar matters and events. Sensitivity toward matters, things, feelings such
as joy, anger, sadness and contentment, as well as the development of emotions,
enriches the drawing activity.
As
noted above, the development of various skills promote the development of
drawing expression. And, the fulfillment of life experience and the expansion
of worldview are greatly influences for the furthering of drawing activities.
By expressing these in pictures, the consciousness becomes entrenched in the
child, it enriches the world of creativity, and expands the substance of daily
life. From this, there arise correlating effects such as progressing the child's
overall skills or development of drawing.
The
development of children's drawing expression follows basically the same path
for every child. In addition, although there exist some differences in
lifestyle, at the infant stage, all children around the world show a
universally shared development process. In children's pictures, there may be
the primordial shapes and forms of drawing activity.
Among
these, the most well-known and the most often used is the DAM (Draw-a-Man),
issued by Good enough in 1926. It is an intelligence test that is measured
using portrait drawings and using IQ (intelligence quotient) as a basis.
Drawing a person is, at the same time as expressing a subject that belongs to
the category of people, also to express what kind of being the self is.
Consequently, portrait drawings are an image of the self and an image of
others, and it is necessarily drawn based on various perceptive information
such as self-acceptance information, visual information, knowledge acquired by
learning, and actual experiences (Joseph, 1996).
Order
to read into pictures, firstly, it is important to constantly pay attention to
the first impression of a drawing. Rather than interpreting a picture, it is
more important to emphasize the first feeling that the reader had. The person
who interprets must become conscious of the impression that he or she feels,
and must keep this information until much later. Sometimes, there is a
possibility that the first impression that was felt means that there was close
contact with the drawer’s unconscious world. Also, instead of putting the focus
on finding symbols, there is a need to look at the picture as a whole. The
integrated whole is larger than a total sum of its parts. This is called the
"pre-eminence of the whole”.
2.2 Assessment of
the visual arts
Assessment in Visual Arts does not just involve test and measurement but overall evaluation. Overall assessment allows students to combine their understanding of the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective. Indirectly, the evaluation emphasizes focus on actions that elicited student thinking skills and produce students who are able to make decisions. Effectiveness of these subjects can be measured through School-Based Operations Assessment undertaken in school level.
The evaluation of Visual Arts of the Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah have the four elements of school-based assessment, evaluation of a flexible, assessment with accountability, and fair assessment.
School-based assessment should be planned and managed on an ongoing basis in terms of construction and administration of assessment tools. Flexible assessment emphasizes assessment taking into account the needs of the school and its pupils themselves in terms of student learning styles and intelligences. Evaluation can be done individually or in groups. Teachers are fully responsible for carrying out assessment with accountability such as planning, determination of the instrument, as well as its implementation. In addition, teachers should also record achievement of students, analyze the marks, and report to the relevant actions. Assessment in Visual Arts is just because of the way, form, and content should be in accordance with the conditions and characteristics of students. Pupils are assessed in terms of their knowledge, how they think, and their psychomotor ability.
There are three methods of
assessment in Visual Arts, in particular, the observation, oral and
interaction, as well as writing. Observation method involves observation of
work processes and observations. Observations made by teachers during the
student do the work known as the observation process useful for teachers to
assess mastery of practical skills and the development of pupils. In addition,
teachers can assess mastery of social skills, students practice and observe
labour emotions and feelings.
The level of student
creativity can also be detected by observation. Achievement abilities and
skills of students who demonstrated in the work done by looking at the specific
criteria for evaluation work. The criteria selected for evaluation is
composite, interpretation, skill, function, originality, creativity, and
finishes. This is known as a view of the work. Oral and interaction methods can
help teachers assess students' mastery of artistic aspects through the
activities. For example, the questionnaires, quizzes, discussions,
brainstorming, poetry, interviews, storytelling, acting, and singing.
2.3 The Definition of Learning Styles
2.3 The Definition of Learning Styles
Learning
styles may be defined in multiple ways, depending upon one’s perspective. Here
are a few definitions of learning styles. Brown (2000) defines learning styles
as the manner in which individuals perceive and process information in learning
situations. He argues that learning style preference is one aspect of learning
style, and refers to the choice of one learning situation or condition over
another. Celcia-Murcia (2001) defines learning styles as the general
approaches—for example, global or analytic, auditory or visual—that students
use in acquiring a new language or in learning any other subject. The manner in
which a learner perceives, interacts with, and responds to the learning
environment. Learning style is sometimes defined as the characteristic
cognitive, affective, social, and physiological behaviors that serve as
relatively stable indicators of how learners perceive, interact with, and
respond to the learning environment” (MacKeracher, 2004).
2.3.1 General
Learning Styles
There are three main
learning styles; visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. The definitions of these
learning styles are as follows:
A. Visual
Visual learners think
in pictures and learn best in visual images. They depend on the instructor or
facilitator‚ nonverbal cues such as body language to help with understanding.
Sometimes, visual learners favour sitting in the front of the classroom. They
also take descriptive notes over the material being presented.
B. Auditory
These individuals
discover information through listening and interpreting information by the
means of pitch, emphasis and speed. These individuals gain knowledge from
reading out loud in the classroom and may not have a full understanding of
information that is written.
C. Kinesthetic
Learner
Individuals that are kinesthetic
learn best with and active approach.
These learners favour interaction with the physical world. Most of the time kinesthetic
learners have a difficult time staying on target and can become unfocused
effortlessly.
2.3.2 Visual,
Auditory and Kinesthetic Learning Styles
According to Dunn and Dunn (1978), only 20-30% of
school age children appear to be auditory learners, 40% are visual learners,
and 30-40% are tactile/kinesthetic or visual/tactile learners. (Milone, 1981)stated
that for grade school children the most frequent modality strengths are visual
(30%) or mixed (30%), followed by auditory (25%), and then by kinesthetic
(15%). Price, Dunn, and Sanders (1980) found that very young children are the
most tactile/kinesthetic, that there is a gradual development of visual
strengths through the elementary grades, and that only in fifth or sixth grade
can most youngsters learn and retain information through the auditory sense.
Carbo (1983), investigating the perceptual styles of readers, found that good
readers prefer to learn through their visual and auditory senses, while poor
readers have a stronger preference for tactile and kinesthetic learning.
Previous studies into the learning styles of EFL students have generally
reported that they favor Kinesthetic and Tactile styles, and disfavor Group
styles. Two empirical studies that investigated non-Chinese EFL students based
on Reid's typology are Rossi-Le (1995) and Hyland (1993). Rossi-Le surveyed
adult L2 immigrants in the US. They favoured Kinesthetic and Tactile styles and
did not disfavor any styles. Hyland's Japanese learners favored Auditory and
Tactile styles, and disfavored Visual and Group styles (1993). Hyland also
reports that senior students favored kinesthetic styles.
2.3.3 Importance of Learning
Styles
One of the most significant issues in learning to
learn is an individual’s taking the responsibility for his/her own learning.
The individuals should know what their own learning styles are and what characteristics
this style has and they should thereby behave according to this style. In this
way, the individual can acquire the constantly changing and increasing amount
of information without need for the assistance of others. When the learner
takes the responsibility of his/her own learning, s/he attributes meaning to
the process of learning. S/he develops an understanding of his/her own form of
learning style and becomes much more satisfied with the environment s/he
interacts with. Every opportunity for learning is a chance for him/her. It is
in the learner’s hand to use different ways and develop the learning styles to
some extent (Coffield, 2004).
Learning style is important for many reasons;
however, there are three vital ones. First of all, people’s learning styles
will vary because everyone is different from one another naturally. Secondly,
it offers the opportunity to teach by using a wide range of methods in an
effective way. Sticking to just one model unthinkingly will create a monotonous
learning environment, so not everyone will enjoy the lesson. In other words,
learning and teaching will be just words and not rooted in reality. Thirdly, we
can manage many things in education and communication if we really recognize
the groups we are called to. Of course, we may not know every detail; however, being
aware of our students’ learning styles, psychological qualities and
motivational differences will help us regulate our lessons appropriately and
according to the conditions (Coffield 2004).
2.3.4 The advantages of identifying
learning styles
Learning style has an important place in the lives
of individuals. When the individual knows his/her learning style, s/he will
integrate it in the process of learning so s/he will learn more easily and fast
and will be successful. Another advantage of the identification of the own
learning style by the student is that it will help the student to become an
effective problem solver. The more successful the individual is at solving the
problems s/he faces, the more control she/he will take over his/her own life (Biggs,
2001). It is important that individuals receive education in areas suitable for
their learning styles. A person educated in an area having no relationship to
his/her learning style may lack confidence and she/he may be less successful;
she/he may as a result become frustrated.
Knowledge of
learning style also provides information to the student as to why s/he has
learnt in a different way than others. It helps to control the process of
learning. It is vital because one of the most important signals in learning is
to learn to be autonomous, that is, for the individual to take responsibility
for his/her own learning. Because of this, she/he should know what learning
style is. This has to be part of the learning process to enable the individual
to obtain knowledge, which constantly shifts and changes, without any help from
others. Briefly, confidence in learning will consistently rise when learners
know how to learn.
Learning to learn and grasping knowledge in a
suitable manner will lessen the need for an overbearing control by teachers. At
this point, teachers guide the students. The students take responsibility for
their learning, they are at the centre of the process and everything is under
their control. They search answers to the problems and benefit from their
unique performances and preferences in their learning styles. Those people will
identify their aims, unlike those whose learning style preferences are not
identified. They know what they want to learn and “how.” This awareness will
change their perspectives on learning new things (Fidan, 1986).
2.4 Summary
Only relevant literature was reviewed in this
chapter. Concepts like the terminology in Malay, definition and the curriculum is essential to understand the
following chapters. Due to limitation of literature it is hope that further
study will be done by other researchers benefit others.
Abdul Rahim Abdul Rashid, A. A. (1992).
Panduan Latihan Mengajar. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.
Davies. (1993). Shards of glass.
Isabelle D. Cherney, C. S. (2006).
Children’s Drawings: A mirror to their.
Kindler. (1996). Myths, habits, research
and policy: The four pillars of early childhood art education. 24 – 30.
Malaysia, K. P. (2010). Kurikulum Standard
Sekolah Rendah. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Malaysia, K. P. (2011). www.emoe.gov.my.
Slavin. (1991). Student team learning : A
practical guide to cooperative learning.
Voy, L. (2001). Children’s drawings: A
cross-cultural analysis from Japan and the United States. 22,53-63.
Wright, S. (2003). The Arts, Young
Children, and Learning. Pearson.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience. New
York: Penguin. 2005 edition.
Fidan. Project Zero (1986) "Reviewing
Education and the Arts Project" (REAP),
Harvard University Press
Harvey, A. (1997) ‘An Intelligence View of Music
Education’ in Leka Nu Hou, The
Hawaiian Music Educators Association Bulletin, Feb
1997
Heathcote, D. & Bolton, G. (1995) Drama for
Learning: Dorothy Heathcote’s Mantle of
the Expert Approach to Education. London: Heinemann
Henaghan, F. (2004) MEND: A Review of Music
Education in Ireland. Dublin: DIT
Herron, D. (1985) Deaf Ears? Dublin: The
Arts Council
Carbo, M., Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1983). Teaching
students to read through their individual learning
styles. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Coffield. (2004). Visual, auditory, kinesthetic:
Which is your Child?
Hayes, J.
(2005). Teach to students’ learning styles.
Craft, A. (2000), Creativity Across the Primary
Curriculum, London: Routledge
Cutietta, R., Hamann, D., Miller Walker, L. (1995).
Spin-Offs: The Extra-Musical
Advantages of a Musical Education. United Musical Instruments U.S.A., Inc. for
the
Future of Music Project.
Curriculum and Examinations Board. (1985) The
Arts in Education. Dublin: Author
Department of Education (1971) Curaclam na
Bunscoile, Dublin: Department of
Education
Department of Education & Science (1999) Primary
School Curriculum, Dublin:
Stationery Office
Department of Education (1977), The New Primary
School Curriculum: Its
implementation and effects. Dublin: Educational Research Centre
H. D.
Brown,'' Principles of language teaching and learning,'' (4th ed.)
White
Plains, NY: Longman, 2000.
M.
Carbo,'' Research in reading and learning style: Implications for
exceptional children,'' Exceptional Children, 1983,
49, pp. 486-494.
Biggs,
J. (2001). Enhancing Learning: A Matter of Style or Approach? Perspectives
on
Thinking,
Learning and Cognitive Styles, R. J. Sternberg, L. F.
Zhang (Eds.). Mahwah,
Lawrance
Erlbaum Associates, N. J., ISBN: 0-8058-3431-1, 276.
Brown,
H. D. (2000). Principles of language teaching and learning, (4th ed.).
White Plains,
NY:
Longman.
No comments:
Post a Comment